Occupational risk prevention in public administrations and local authorities

Prevention in a public administration must cover very different activities: offices, services to the public, work crews, facilities and services. Belonging to the same organisation does not mean everyone shares the same risks or that a generic office assessment is sufficient.

In brief

The challenge is to combine a common organisational structure with measures suited to each service. The administration’s roles as employer, premises controller and contracting authority should be distinguished. This article focuses on managing prevention, rather than regulatory powers over third parties.

Contents
  1. Mapping sites, services and tasks
  2. Clarifying the applicable framework
  3. Integrating decisions and resources
  4. Participation and communication between teams
  5. Contractors and shared activities
  6. Hypothetical example: facility maintenance
  7. Related concepts
  8. References

A–Z dictionary →

Mapping sites, services and tasks

The prevention inventory must identify who works, where, with which equipment and under what conditions. Work in public spaces, travel, temporary facilities and services outside the organisation’s own buildings must also be represented.

HSE illustrates the variety of municipal work, including maintenance, parks, waste and social care. Assessment is organised around actual activities, without automatically transferring a measure from one service to another.

Clarifying the applicable framework

In Spain, Royal Decree 67/2010 adapts occupational risk prevention to the General State Administration and certain linked or dependent bodies within its scope. It does not automatically apply to every local authority merely because it is a public administration.

The regulations applicable to the organisation and workforce concerned must be identified. The particular features of certain public activities require specific review; they do not justify concluding that an entire service falls outside prevention requirements.

Integrating decisions and resources

The prevention structure needs responsible people able to act on purchasing, maintenance, staffing and planning. A technical report without a process for deciding on and implementing measures leaves the risk unresolved.

Priorities must consider tasks and their consequences, rather than only a department’s size. It should be clear who resolves a measure affecting several services and how follow-up is maintained when responsible personnel change.

Participation and communication between teams

Consultation and participation help reveal difficulties in daily activity. Bodies and representatives must operate within their framework, with sufficient information to monitor measures and identify needs.

Accessible channels are also needed for teams that do not normally work at a computer. An instruction posted on an intranet may not effectively reach a work crew or staff providing mobile support services.

Contractors and shared activities

Coordination of activities must cover simultaneous work, access, facilities and incident response. The contract does not replace communication on prevention during execution.

External works or services can change conditions for internal staff and the public. Interactions must be identified and measures checked at the workplace, with clear responsibility for authorising changes or stopping an unforeseen situation.

Hypothetical example: facility maintenance

A local authority schedules a repair while the building continues to serve the public. Those responsible review affected areas, circulation, access and coordination with the company carrying out the work.

Information is communicated to the staff involved and checked during execution. On completion, restoration of safe conditions is verified. Management connects the technical service, user department and prevention function in a single verifiable decision.

References

  1. BOE. Royal Decree 67/2010: purpose and scope. Official source
  2. HSE. Local authority services and activities. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: 19 October 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Sabentis Editorial Team.

Author: Pablo RodríguezLinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra